Loom is one of the most popular screen recorders around, especially for async work — record a quick video, get an instant shareable link, and send it to your team. It is a cloud-based, subscription tool, and that cloud-first model is both its biggest strength and the reason some people look for an alternative.
Mac Screen Recorder takes a different approach: a native Mac app where you record locally, own your files, and pay once. Here is how they compare.
Loom is excellent when sharing speed and team collaboration matter most. Recordings are hosted in Loom’s cloud and become a link instantly, with features built around viewing, commenting, and managing a library of videos across a team. If your whole workflow is “record and send a link,” Loom is purpose-built for it.
| Mac Screen Recorder | Loom | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Native macOS app | Cloud-based recorder |
| Pricing | $19 one-time | Free tier; paid from ~$12.50/user/mo |
| Where recordings live | On your Mac (you own the files) | Hosted in Loom’s cloud |
| Auto zoom & click effects | Yes | Not the focus |
| Export formats | MP4, WebM, GIF (up to 4K) | Mainly share-link / video |
| Best for | Owning polished recordings | Instant cloud sharing & teams |
As of June 2026, Loom offers a free tier, with paid plans starting around $12.50–$15 per user per month (billed annually). Plans change regularly — check loom.com for the latest.
Choose Loom if instant cloud links and team video libraries are central to how you work. Choose Mac Screen Recorder if you would rather own your files, skip the subscription, and get a polished, edited look automatically — all for a one-time $19.